For Oct 9
- REMEMBER - THIS WAS WRITTEN BEFORE DC V. HELLER
pp 152-160: you can read this or skip it. I think it reads, now, as an indicator of how much law Scalia chose to discard in his DC v. Heller decision. lternatively, you can think of it as the legal basis for what Scalia decided were "presumptively lawful" restrictions.
161 - on
what are majority American views on gun control
factors undermining state and local policies
impacts of gun control laws on suicide
crime gun movement
nature of state and local firearms regulations
sentence enhancement /Project Exile
2nd Amendment: key text
District of Columbia v. Heller and what this decision characterized as "presumptively lawful"
in Heller: "core interest at the heard of the Second Amendment" (227)
"two pronged approach to Second Amendment challenges" (226 on): scope and burden
well regulated (228)
firearms "in common use"
"dangerous and unusual weapons"
NOTE - LINK TO MAJORITY OPINION IN DC V. HELLER, AND TWO DISSENTING OPINIONS