TO: Students in CJ 160
FROM: R. B. Taylor
DATE: 2-23-99
RE: Assignment for Paper 2; Instructions for Lab 2-25-99
This memo contains the paper assignment, followed by
step-by-step instructions on how to locate the information you need
on the web or on the CDROM followed by extra resource pages. Try and
read this before the lab on 2-25
PAPER ASSIGNMENT
BEFORE YOU GET STARTED WRITING YOUR PAPER YOU WILL NEED THE FOLLOWING:
1. Frequency distributions from class assessment data for the following items:
Q28
Q29
Q38
Q39
These appear at the end of the handout. Be sure you understand what is happening with these variables.
2. The actual assessment questionnaire itself, so you
can refer to the exact wording of the questions.
3. If you are working on computers at school, be sure to take 2 blank, formatted floppies with you so you can store tables.
4. To have carefully read the material in RMCJ about survey questions and response formats AND the pages about interpreting crosstab tables.
5. TIME TO READ THIS ASSIGNMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY, VERY CAREFULLY, SO THAT YOU ARE CLEAR ABOUT THE RESOURCES PROVIDED, AND THE STEPS REQUIRED.
PURPOSES
This assignment serves the following purposes.
You will compare how students in your 160 class
answered questions about attitudes toward the criminal justice system
with a nationally representative sample of college graduates, taken
in the last couple of years- 1995 or later. To make this comparison
you will construct at least three crosstab tables
and interpret each.
THE ASSIGNMENT
Look up data from the Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics for a recent year, preferably 1995 or later, for at least 3 of the above four questions. You can do your lookup in one of three ways: go to the appropriate volume in the library, run the CDROM you purchased, or access the Sourcebook over the web. I give you some hints on the search strategies you want to use when using each of these sources.
PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO THIS POINT BECAUSE I AM SURE THAT SOME OF YOU ARE GOING TO MISS THIS: The data I want you to recover from the national polls is for College Graduate. I am presuming since our group is mixed on age, mixed on race, mixed on city/suburban, that the most appropriate comparison group is college graduates. I am sure you all will be graduating in a timely fashion from our August institution.
STEP 1: look up the data you need. Save the information.
STEP 2: For each outcome, construct the data table
comparing how you answered the question to how national college
graduates answered it. For the class data you are entering
the number from "valid percent" for each category.
Note further for two tables you are going to need to collapse
the data for the two categories "A Great Deal" and
"Quite a Lot." You will enter the appropriate
percentages from the national sample (ww, xx, yy, zz) from the data
you look up. Note further that in the none category
there are no data from 160, because this was not offered as a
response category. In the national sample it was a
"volunteered" response - enough people offered it so the
surveyor put it in. So we just put in 0 here. (1 point for correctly
constructing each table: 3 total)
STEP 3. Interpret each data table. Do you see
"major differences" between the national sample of college
graduates and the 160 results? If so describe the specific difference
you see. See FAQs for more on what is a "major
difference" (1 point for correctly interpreting each table: 3 total)
For example, in the case of Question 28 the table
would look like this:
|
PUT THE QUESTION HERE |
CJ 160 1999 |
College Graduates Nationally BE SURE TO PUT THE YEAR HERE |
|
None |
0% |
ww% |
|
Very Little |
6.8% |
xx% |
|
Some |
39% |
yy% |
|
Quite a lot AND A great deal |
54.3% |
z.% |
100%100%
You will have at least 3 tables like this.
STEP 4. When you add all these results together, are
there any general statements you can make about how your group
differs from college graduates nationally? I hope this section will
be thoughtful. It should run at least a half a page.
This is where you synthesize and think about the differences/lack of
differences you have seen. (3 points).
STEP 5. Pick one of the four items
used and criticize either its format, or its response categories. Be
specific. Tie your criticism in to the guidelines in RMCJ for
questions and response categories. (1 point).
EXTRA CREDIT. If you want to go ahead and get national
data for all four questions, and interpret that
table, you can get 2 extra points. HINT: this fourth table will not
be available over the web; you will need to use either the Sourcebook
in the library or the CDROM.
SPECIFICS
All the usual paper guidelines apply. See the syllabus. Your papers should be typed, doublespaced with ONLY your SSN at the top of each page. You will lose points if your name appears anywhere on the paper. You can lose points for mis-spelled words and grammatical mistakes. Your paper should be no longer than four pages; I reserve the right to stop reading at that point unless it is really interesting. BE SURE TO ATTACH THE XEROX OR PDF PRINTOUTS FOR EACH PAGE OF DATA YOU DISCUSS.
DUE: 3-16-99 by class time.
FAQs
WHAT IS THE SOURCEBOOK OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE STATISTICS?
The Sourcebook is a yearly publication compiling a range of information about the criminal justice system, crime, and people's attitudes toward crime and the criminal justice system. It is compiled by the Bureau of Criminal Justice Statistics.
HOW DO I GET TO THE SOURCEBOOK?
You have three options.
1) You can go to the library and dig out the bound yearly volume, and look up specific tables. If you look at the questionnaire you will see that particular attitude items have numbers after them. These numbers refer to table numbers. These numbers are specific only to the year noted in Footnote 1 on p. 4 of the questionnaire. The same table may not appear from year to year. The same table may appear with a different number in different years. Tables in the Sourcebook are ordered sequentially. So it should be easy to find the table you need.
2) You can start up the CDROM you purchased in the bookstore for $11.50. You will need to be working at a computer where you can write to the hard disk drive.
3) You can access the sourcebook over the www, using computers at campus or any computer where you have a browser and can get to the web.
WHAT ARE THE DISADVANTAGES AND ADVANTAGES OF EACH APPROACH
The web only has a subset of information that has appeared in previous years. The CDROM has complete data for three earlier years: 1994, 1995, and 1996. But you cannot run the CDROM on campus computers. You can access the web Sourcebook on the campus computers.
WHAT IS A MAJOR DIFFERENCE?
In thinking about differences between CJ160 students and a national sample of college graduates, you need to decide on how much should the difference be before I get excited. This is really a complicated question that takes into account poll sampling error. For more details, see Appendix 6 in the CD-ROM or library version of the 1996 Sourcebook. For our purposes here, a difference is a major difference if it is 5 or more percentage points away from the national results.
HOW DO I RUN THE CDROM?
Background
Where
You can run this from any computer that allows you to write to a hard disk.
It does not appear, after testing, that you can run
the CDROM from a computer in a lab, because the CDROM wants to
install an icon on the hard drive, and this is forbidden. Even though
it looks like there is an option allowing you to run the program from
the CDROM
Starting
Start the CDROM by inserting it into the cdrom drive. It should start automatically. If it does not, start up Windows Explorer, go to the CD drive, and click on setup. You will have the option of running it from the cd rom, or installing Adobe Acrobat on the hard drive.
Look First
Look first at the extensive orientation to the CDROM in the welcome section. Those pages help you find your way around the Sourcebook, and orient you to the tools that are there. Pay particular attention the different ways you can find information.
*You can look at the list of tables
* You can search on specific words
What you are looking for
All the material you are looking for is in section 2, Attitudes toward the criminal justice system.
In Acrobat reader
* CLICK TOOLS
* CLICK FIND
enter the following
For Q28: search for confidence in the police or Table 2.11in the 1995 volume
For Q29: search for confidence in the criminal justice system or Table 2.12 in the 1995 volume
For Q38: search for Table 2.45 in the 1995 volume
For Q39: go to Table 2.82 in the 1995 volume (DO NOT use table 2.81)
When you are looking by table number go to "Figure and Table list", scroll to the table you want, click on it, it will take you there.
You either will need to save your files, or print them
out. If you plan on printing them out later, you will need to have
Adobe Acrobat on your computer. You are saving PDF files, which are a
format proprietary to
ON THE WEB
1. Get your web browser started
2. Enter the following address in the url box up top:
http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/
3. Hit enter and you will go there
4. Scroll down and click on SEARCH BY KEYWORDS
5. Click on SEARCH THE INDEX
6. In the box up top "search for a keyword" enter the following:
Q28confidence AND police
7. Click on VIEW MATCHES
8. You have the choice of looking at 1996 or 1998 data. go for what is more current. Click on ACROBAT FILE.
9. Table should come up. Either print it out or save it to a file to print later.
REPEAT STEPS 6 THROUGH 9 FOR THE OTHER TABLES.
Other search hints for other tables:
Q29 confidence AND criminal AND justice
Q38not available on www
Q39You will need to search the list of tables in section 2 under GUN CONTROL POLICIES. There are several possibilities here - be sure you have the table that exactly matches what you are looking for.
Click on TABLE AND FIGURE LIST
Click on SECTION 2
Scroll down to GUN CONTROL POSSIBILITIES
Check out the two tables you see there; get the correct one. NOTE - this 1996 table will have a different number than the one listed in the questionnaire for 1995.
Q28 POLICE
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
VERY LITTLE 0 4 6.7 6.8 6.8
SOME 1 23 38.3 39.0 45.8
QUITE A LOT 2 26 43.3 44.1 89.8
GREAT DEAL 3 6 10.0 10.2 100.0
. 1 1.7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 60 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 59 Missing cases 1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
Q29 CJ SYSTEM
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
VERY LITTLE 0 6 10.0 10.2 10.2
SOME 1 23 38.3 39.0 49.2
QUITE A LOT 2 22 36.7 37.3 86.4
GREAT DEAL 3 8 13.3 13.6 100.0
. 1 1.7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 60 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 59 Missing cases 1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
Q38 STRICTER GUN CONTROL
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
NOT AT ALL 0 8 13.3 15.1 15.1
LITTLE 1 18 30.0 34.0 49.1
A LOT 2 27 45.0 50.9 100.0
. 1 1.7 Missing
DON 3 6 10.0 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 60 100.0 100.0
Valid cases 53 Missing cases 7
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
Q39 FIREARM LAWS
Valid Cum
Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent
MADE LESS STRICT 0 2 3.3 3.6 3.6
KEPT AS THEY ARE NOW 1 19 31.7 33.9 37.5
MADE MORE STRICT 2 35 58.3 62.5 100.0
. 3 5.0 Missing
3 1 1.7 Missing
------- ------- -------
Total 60 100.0 100.0